Difference between revisions of "User:Sahadeva/Sandbox"
From Vanictionary
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
_____`o_ | _____`o_ | ||
| + | |||
| + | __NOTOC__ | ||
| + | <div align=center> | ||
| + | [[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#A|<big>A</big>]] | | ||
| + | [[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#B|<big>B</big>]] | | ||
| + | [[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#C|<big>C</big>]] | | ||
| + | [[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#D|<big>D</big>]] | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == A == | ||
| + | |||
| + | lso called retroduction. It is the acceptance of a philosophical premise on the basis of its power to account for causation with logic and evidence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == B == | ||
| + | |||
| + | lso called retroduction. It is the acceptance of a philosophical premise on the basis of its power to account for causation with logic and evidence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == C == | ||
| + | |||
| + | lso called retroduction. It is the acceptance of a philosophical premise on the basis of its power to account for causation with logic and evidence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == D == | ||
| + | |||
| + | lso called retroduction. It is the acceptance of a philosophical premise on the basis of its power to account for causation with logic and evidence. | ||
Revision as of 14:06, 25 April 2014
_____`o_
A
lso called retroduction. It is the acceptance of a philosophical premise on the basis of its power to account for causation with logic and evidence.
B
lso called retroduction. It is the acceptance of a philosophical premise on the basis of its power to account for causation with logic and evidence.
C
lso called retroduction. It is the acceptance of a philosophical premise on the basis of its power to account for causation with logic and evidence.
D
lso called retroduction. It is the acceptance of a philosophical premise on the basis of its power to account for causation with logic and evidence.
